Was Blessed Dominic Barberi, the Passionist priest who received Venerable John Henry Cardinal Newman into the Catholic Church, a promoter of ecumenism? It depends on how you define that all-too-elastic term. In his letter to the Passionist Congregation anticipating the beatification of Cardinal Newman later this year, Fr. Ottaviano D’Egidio, Superior General of the Passionists, envisions Bl. Dominic as a precursor of the ‘new” ecumenism of “dialogue”:
Dominic, who was probably the first to use the expression “separated brethren” to refer to non-Catholic Christians, shared with Newman a great respect toward the other churches, which in turn inspired them to avoid disrespect, animosity, and the defamation which unfortunately was prevalent among the various Christian denominations until the Vatican Council II. In this sense, they are both precursors of the Ecumenical Movement and promoters of ecumenism that was based on harmony, listening and mutual respect. “Cor ad cor loquitur” (Heart speaks to heart), was the Episcopal motto of Newman, and Dominic was filled with love toward the separated brothers and sisters.
With all due respect to the Superior General, he presents a misleading picture of these two leading figures of the “Second Spring” of English Catholicism. While there is no doubt that Newman and Barberi evangelized in a spirit of charity and sensitivity among English protestants, it is far-fetched at best to suppose that they “respected” the schismatic and heretical sects that stood (and continue to stand) outside of and in opposition to the One Sheepfold of Jesus Christ.
Indeed, how can anyone who reads the “Lamentation of England” possibly imagine that Bl. Dominic would ever have endorsed a false ecumenism that favors “dialogue” over conversion? Dominic’s “Lamentation” is a source of light for anyone who wishes to understand the meaning of true ecumenism, which can only be an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church.
As for Bl. Dominic’s alleged “respect” for the blasphemous rites and false doctrines of those “other churches” that had spurned the Bride of Jesus Christ, let the following passage from the “Lamentation” suffice to dispel any misconception:
Behold, O Lord, how our inheritance is passed into the hands of strangers; our Sacraments, which thou didst leave to us, are in the hands of heretical ministers, who abuse this sacred inheritance, which of right belongs to us, being merited and purchased for us by the shedding of thy divine blood. Our temples, those venerable churches which were built by our ancestors and dedicated to thy divine majesty which, in the happy days of old England when we were thy elect people, we used to assemble before thee, have been seized and polluted by strangers, by the followers of Calvin and Cranmer, and innumerable other heretics, who impiously blaspheme thee in their infamous conventicles. … Alas ! alas ! for now is thy house become the den of wild beasts, where thy holy name and thy awful majesty is blasphemed and trodden under foot: yea in her own temple thy spouse the Church is detested, anathematised, slandered as an adulteress and unfaithful. Behold it, O Lord, behold it I beseech thee. (“Lamentation” 1)
It is good that Passionists throughout the world recall the deep ties linking the Passionist Congregation to the “Second Spring” of Catholicism in 19th century England, as well as the role of Blessed Dominic Barberi, C.P., in the conversion of Venerable John Henry Newman. In so recalling, let us also call to mind the meaning of true ecumenism as exemplified by Bl. Dominic Barberi.
Bl. Dominic, pray for us! Pray for the conversion of England and America!

























